|
NHL Lockout: What's Next?
More talks
Sunday, April 24, 2005
Despite all the talk of the proposed NHL
buyout, the new WHA and a possible European Super League,
the hot topic of the NHL lockout is once again going to be about
talks between the league and the NHLPA. The two sides are
set to meet again later this week at an undisclosed location.
Commissioner Gary Bettman made it clear after
last week's NHL Board of Governor's meeting that he planned to
try to get the NHLPA engaged in more talks soon. And he
apparently made the move Friday, inviting the PA back to the
negotiating table. The NHLPA has accepted.
Both Bettman and NHLPA executive director Bob
Goodenow are expected to attend this week's get together.
The players had indicated last week that they were in no
hurry to jump right back into negotiations.
"It's important for both sides to take a
little time to reassess," players'
association president Trevor Linden said
last week. "The process at this point hasn't
worked, and we'll step back and have a look
back at how we can move this thing forward.
To get right back at it and start
firing proposals, I'm not sure that's the
right way to do it."
There's been one line of thought that there is little
pressure on the players right now because they are not due to
start getting paid again until October, but former Vancouver GM
Brian Burke doesn't buy it.
"I think there is tremendous pressure on both
sides," Burke told CKNW radio in Vancouver late last week. "I
don't buy this bit that players don't get paychecks until the
fall. A lot of guys aren't signed. A whole bunch of contracts
expire on June 30th. I don't think those players want to go a
whole summer wondering whether they are going to have work or
not."
"I think right now you are looking at a terrible
script if you're a player and a terrible script if you are an
owner."
Burke believes, as do many others, that right
now is a crucial time for the league as it tries to build a
revenue base for next season.
A deal in the next month or two would also
permit the league to move forward and hold the NHL Entry Draft
in June.
It would also would help as the league tries to
re-invent itself in an attempt to win back fans and rebuild
relationships with sponsors.
Also, ESPN is expected to decide in April whether to
exercise its option to pay the NHL $60 million in rights fees
for the 2005-06 season.
"There should be tremendous pressure to get this
done before ESPN makes its decision, before other sponsors
decide to bail and to give the owners a chance to get some
revenue in. So there should be tremendous pressure. I think they
are both in terrible spots," said Burke.
Detroit Red Wings GM Ken Holland agrees that
this is a crucial time, and that
getting a deal done soon is key.
"From our perspective, the
next two months are crucial," Holland told the Detroit News. "If
we can get a (contract) done between now and May, we can get
into our markets ... and repair the damage done between the game
and our fans."
It's believed the Board of
Governors would meet in another six to eight weeks if no
progress is made in the negotiations. At that time Bettman would
apparently outline alternative plans for playing in 2005-06.
Outside of an agreement
with an agreement with the NHLPA, the options aren't
pretty even though the league has ruled out canceling
another season. After last week's Board of Governors meeting,
Bettman made it clear the league intended to play one way or
another in 2005-06.
That leaves the replacements option, which Burke said could involve some different scenarios.
"There are two ways to use replacement players:
Implementation and impasse and then in an at least a number of
U.S. jurisdictions not declaring impasse," Burke said.
The route of declaring impasse and then
implementing terms has been the most widely discussed
replacement player option.
"If you declare impasse, you got to the National
Labor Relations Board, you get a judicial affirmation of the
fact that the parties are at impasse. There's no slam dunk in
that by the way. There's no guarantee they'll get it," said
Burke.
Then there is the option of not declaring an
impasse, which would mean true replacement players because no
NHLPA members would be allowed to play in the NHL.
"You can just open your
doors and say we are going to hire temporary replacements. Say
these are the terms and conditions we are going to offer those
jobs under," Burke said. "No one from the bargaining unit can cross that line.
This means truly replacement players. The guys who are members
of the NHLPA would not be permitted to work."
"There are couple of other esoteric things.
There's such a thing as a partial lockout."
The Detroit News reported over the weekend that
the league has discussed the option of possibly lifting the
lockout for players who made less than $1 million in 2003-04.
But the word is the league is still not ready to
focus on those issues right now.
"We didn't discuss [replacements] for five
minutes, honestly," Washington owner Ted Leonsis told the
Washington Times following last week's Board of Governors
Meeting. "I believe [Bettman] didn't even want to address that.
But the talk is, by the next meeting there will be progress, and
if not, [Bettman] will come to us with an alternative plan."
The goal for now is to try to hammer out a deal
with the players. One owner saw the news of these next rounds of
talks as a glimmer of hope.
"I'm hopeful [they get a deal done] because any
time you get the parties together, there always has to be hope,"
Montreal Canadiens owner George Gillett told the Canadian Press
Monday. "And the fact that the commissioner asked for it and Mr.
Goodenow said yes, that always gives us hope."
But some observers, like TSN's Bob McKenzie,
remain skeptical.
"Common sense would suggest both sides realize
it's in their best interest to do a deal before May 1st,"
McKenzie said Monday night on the Canadian network, "but common
sense would have dictated not having to be the first pro sports
league to lose an entire season to labor strife. So don't hold
your breath on that one."
|